On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Kumar Gala [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sep 22, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Andrew Bresticker [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Kumar Gala [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Andrew Bresticker [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Bresticker
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Add the vendor prefix "mti" for MIPS Technologies, Inc.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <redacted>
---
New for v2.
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
index ac7269f..efa5a5b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt

@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ microchip     Microchip Technology Inc.

mosaixtech     Mosaix Technologies, Inc.
moxa   Moxa
mpl    MPL AG
+mti    MIPS Technologies, Inc.

Why not mips as that is more common and the stock ticker.

"mti" is already in use, see
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/cpu_irq.txt,
arch/mips/mti-sead3/sead3.dts, and arch/mips/ralink/dts/*.dtsi.

Isn’t mips already used as well:

Yes, however it is only used for CPUs, it does not appear in any
binding document, and no code actually matches against it.

Do you intend to change those usages to “mti” than?

I was not originally planning on it, but I could.