Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2025-03-07

RE: [PATCH RESEND v1] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Correct device state after S4

From: "Xu, Even" <even.xu@intel.com>
Date: 2025-03-05 05:48:59
Also in: lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 1:36 PM
To: Xu, Even <even.xu@intel.com>
Cc: bentiss@kernel.org; srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com; mpearson-
lenovo@squebb.ca; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND v1] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Correct device
state after S4

On Wed, 5 Mar 2025, Xu, Even wrote:
quoted
quoted
I'll now apply this as-is because the code is already in, but
perhaps renaming the flag to QUICKI2C_RESET would be in order.
Current patch is still needed, quickspi device init flow is: init ->
resetting -> reset -> enabled. Exiting code in pm restore() callback
takes reset operation and puts device into reset state, but forgets
move to enabled state after init flow is done.

Thanks for your suggestion! Let me refine the patch in V2.
I have already applied your v1 patch to upstream-fixes queue so that it could go to
Linus quickly, as an important functional fix.

So please base the naming fixup on top of that.
Thanks Jiri!

I didn't realize v1 patch already got applied, just sent out v2 patch this morning.
If so, could you just pick " [PATCH v2 1/2] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Correct device state names gramatically" from v2 patch set for the naming fix?
Those two patches have no confliction/dependence.

Thank you very much!

Best Regards,
Even Xu
Thanks,

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help