Thread (59 messages) 59 messages, 7 authors, 2014-05-22

Re: [PATCH v4 01/24] input: Add ff-memless-next module

From: Michal Malý <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-21 00:08:19
Also in: lkml

On Tuesday 20 of May 2014 19:45:44 simon@mungewell.org wrote:
quoted
quoted
Regarding the question of emulated vs. real effects, can we extend the
API
so that applications can know which effects are really supported, and
enable/disable emulation somehow?
I suppose that a few extra flags (FF_PERIODIC_EMULATED etc.) defined in
"uapi/linux/input.h" should suffice.
The only problem is that we probably want to maintain backward
compatibility so that older apps still see 'PERIODIC' (even though it is
emulated).
--
#define FF_RUMBLE	0x50
#define FF_PERIODIC	0x51
#define FF_CONSTANT	0x52
#define FF_SPRING	0x53
#define FF_FRICTION	0x54
#define FF_DAMPER	0x55
#define FF_INERTIA	0x56
#define FF_RAMP		0x57
--

Do we therefore have to list extra items in our capabilities?
--
static const signed short lg4ff_wheel_effects[] = {
	FF_CONSTANT,
	FF_PERIODIC,
	FF_PERIODIC_NOT_EMULATED,
	FF_AUTOCENTER,
	-1
};
--

Simon
Actually I was thinking something like this:

"input.h"
#define FF_DAMPER	0x55
#define FF_INERTIA	0x56
#define FF_RAMP		0x57
+# define FF_PERIODIC_EMULATED	0x58
+# define FF_RUMBLE_EMULATED	0x59

and

in the future "library-like" reimplementation of MLNX:
#define EMULATE_PERIODIC BIT(0)
#define EMULATE_RUMBLE BIT(1)

kfflib_init(..., EMULATE_PERIODIC | EMULATE_RUMBLE);
for full emulation.

Michal

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help