On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:15:37PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
+config MFD_SMSC
+ bool "Support for the SMSC ECE1099 series chips"
+ depends on I2C=y && MFD_CORE && REGMAP_I2C
This needs to select REGMAP_I2C not depend on it. REGMAP_I2C will only
be enabled by being selected.
+int smsc_read(struct device *child, unsigned int reg,
+ unsigned int *dest)
+{
+ struct smsc *smsc = dev_get_drvdata(child->parent);
+
+ return regmap_read(smsc->regmap, reg, dest);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smsc_read);
I'd suggest making these static inlines in the header given that they're
so trivial.
+static struct regmap_config smsc_regmap_config = {
+ .reg_bits = 8,
+ .val_bits = 8,
+ .cache_type = REGCACHE_COMPRESSED,
+};
Indentation is weird here. For the cache we should have at least
.max_register defined and given the functionality there must surely be
some volatile registers (I'm surprised this works at all as it is, the
cache should break things).
+ of_property_read_u32(node, "clock", &smsc->clk);
+
This is all unconditional, there should be a dependency on this in
Kconfig.
+ regmap_read(smsc->regmap, SMSC_DEV_ID, &ret);
+ dev_dbg(&i2c->dev, "SMSC Device ID: %d\n", ret);
I'd make these log messages dev_info() or something.
+err:
+ kfree(smsc);
Use devm_kzalloc() for this.
+static const struct i2c_device_id smsc_i2c_id[] = {
+ { "smsc", 0},
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, smsc_i2c_id);
This should probably list the part name rather than "smsc" - that seems
far too generic a name to use, obviously smsc produce more than one
part!