On 08/02/2015 05:44 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:

Hello,

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:02:03PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

quoted

If a failed command has a valid autosense there is no need to
retry it on the ATA level; at best we're incurring the same
error again. So rather not retry it here, but leave it to
the SCSI layer to decide if a retry is in order.

Hmmm... I don't know.  So, we change how we handle errors completely
depending on how the device reports it?  Doesn't seem like a
particularly good idea to me.

The whole point of the autosense feature is that you do _not_
have to fall back to the original trial-and-error libata EH,
but know exactly what the problem is. Plus any retry will be giving
us (in most cases) exactly the same sense code.
_And_ the SCSI layer is actually able to understand the sense code,
allowing him to make a better judgment on what to do with that error.

So any retry in the libata layer will only slow things down,
leading to the same results eventually.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		               zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)