Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 3 authors, 2015-08-03

Re: [PATCH 0/6] ZAC host-aware device support

From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date: 2015-08-03 07:24:57
Also in: linux-scsi

On 08/02/2015 06:11 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 15:02 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
quoted
Hi all,

here is a patchset for adding ZAC host-aware device support to libata.
Main bits are translations for ZBC IN and ZBC OUT; others are the
required plumbing like generating the correct VPD pages.
James, do you require a separate patch for adding ZBC IN and ZBC OUT
or is it okay to have it queued here?
This really belongs in the ZBC patch set, doesn't it? Why isn't it
there.  You can't avoid the dependency.  If it goes with the ZAC patch
set, then the ZBC one depends on ZAC.  If it goes properly with ZBC then
you need an additional patch adding the ATA translations after the ZBC
one.  On the whole, I'd prefer the latter so we always have the required
consumers of the API.

In fact, if I read the dependencies correctly, you need the ZBC patches
first, don't you ... otherwise there's nothing to drive host aware ZAC?
No. These patches just implement a proper SATL for ZAC drives.
So in effect they just bring libata support on par with 'real' ZBC
drives, allowing things like 'sg_rep_zones' to work properly there.

As such I've considered those patches to be a precursor for ZBC support.

But then, I don't mind how it's being handled.
I surely can turn things around, ZBC support first, and ZAC as an
add-on to that.
Just say the word.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		               zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help