On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:32 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:24:47PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 9:06 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The usual pattern for the remove calls, like gpiod_remove_lookup_table(),
is to be NULL-aware, i.o.w. become a no-op whenever parameter is NULL.
Update gpiod_remove_lookup_table() call to follow this pattern.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index b02cc2abd3b6..611d6ea82d75 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c

@@ -3460,6 +3460,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_add_lookup_table);
  */
 void gpiod_remove_lookup_table(struct gpiod_lookup_table *table)
 {
+       /* Nothing to remove */
+       if (!table)
+               return;
+
        mutex_lock(&gpio_lookup_lock);

        list_del(&table->list);
--

2.29.2

Applied, thanks!

Thanks. Though I think it can be also applied to I涎 tree since dependency?
Any tags / immutable branch for Wolfram?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Oops I assumed this is independent. In that case:

Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>

Wolfram, please take it through the i2c tree.

Bartosz