Re: [PATCH v4 14/14] video: leds: backlight: lm3533: Support getting LED sources from DT
From: Svyatoslav Ryhel <hidden>
Date: 2026-06-10 14:45:40
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-iio, linux-leds, lkml
вт, 9 черв. 2026 р. о 22:23 Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] пише:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2026 at 07:57:38AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:quoted
Add Control Bank to HVLED/LVLED muxing support based on the led-sources defined in the device tree....quoted
static int lm3533_led_setup(struct lm3533_led *led) { - int ret; + u32 output_cfg_shift = 0;No need to assign the default to this.
This is a personal preference, compiler will optimize it if this is not needed.
quoted
+ u32 output_cfg_val = 0; + u32 output_cfg_mask = 0; + int ret, i;No need to add 'i'.
This is personal preference as well. There is no strict rule that iteration variable must be defined strictly in the for loop.
quoted
+ if (led->num_leds) { + for (i = 0; i < led->num_leds; i++) {for (unsigned int i = 0; i < led->num_leds; i++) {quoted
+ if (led->leds[i] >= LM3533_LVCTRLBANK_MAX) + continue; + + output_cfg_shift = led->leds[i] * 2; + output_cfg_val |= led->id << output_cfg_shift; + output_cfg_mask |= OUTPUT_LVLED_MASK << output_cfg_shift; + } + + /* LVLED1, LVLED2 and LVLED3 */ + ret = regmap_update_bits(led->regmap, LM3533_REG_OUTPUT_CONF1, + output_cfg_mask << OUTPUT_CONF1_SHIFT, + output_cfg_val << OUTPUT_CONF1_SHIFT); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* LVLED4 and LVLED5 */ + ret = regmap_update_bits(led->regmap, LM3533_REG_OUTPUT_CONF2, + output_cfg_mask >> OUTPUT_CONF2_SHIFT, + output_cfg_val >> OUTPUT_CONF2_SHIFT); + if (ret) + return ret; + }...quoted
+ if (led->num_leds > 0) { + ret = device_property_read_u32_array(&pdev->dev, "led-sources", + led->leds, led->num_leds); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get led-sources\n"); + goto err_deregister; + } + }This and other pieces may benefit from local variable struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; defined at the top of the function.
Yes, but this would require an additional patch, which I will not add to this already overinflated series.
...quoted
static int lm3533_bl_setup(struct lm3533_bl *bl)As per above. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko