Am Donnerstag, dem 01.08.2024 um 11:26 +0200 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
Hello Martin,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 11:12:55AM +0200, Martin Kepplinger-Novaković
wrote:
quoted
This makes debugging often easier.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger-Novaković
[off-list ref]
---
drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index f1005bd0c41e3..cc7e7af71891f 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
@@ -502,7 +502,8 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
GPIOD_ASIS);
if (IS_ERR(pb->enable_gpio)) {
ret = dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(pb-quoted
enable_gpio),
- "failed to acquire enable
GPIO\n");
+ "failed to acquire enable GPIO:
%ld\n",
+ PTR_ERR(pb->enable_gpio));
AFAIK dev_err_probe already emits the error code passed as 2nd
parameter. So I wonder about this patch's benefit.
It does. Other messages only take the deferred_probe_reason without the
error code. It's actually fine if users properly enable debugging after
seeing an error and then this change is not needed :)
thanks,
martin