Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Helge as fbdev maintainer

On Tuesday, January 18th, 2022 at 12:41, Daniel Vetter [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:41 AM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi Jani,

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:38 AM Jani Nikula [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Helge Deller [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 1/17/22 22:40, Jani Nikula wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Thomas Zimmermann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Seems like few people read linux-fbdev these days.

How much traffic is there to linux-fbdev that is *not* Cc'd to dri-devel
also?

Doesn't seem like much traffic - which IMHO is OK for such a tree with
mostly just maintenance patches.

quoted

Do we still need a separate linux-fbdev mailing list at all?

Yes. I want to have it seperate of dri-devel.
Actually I'd prefer to drop dri-devel from the list where patches
for fbdev are sent...

Disagreed. If anything, this thread shows we can't have fbdev and drm in
silos of their own.

Unless DRM drops fbdev support. Isn't that the long-term plan anyway?

No. There's way too much old stuff still using the fbdev interface to
do that. We've even done things like standardize the vblank wait
ioctl, because people need that.

Kind of related: I wonder, could we document somewhere that fbdev is a
deprecated uAPI? ie. new user-space shouldn't use it and should prefer DRM.
I don't see that mentioned anywhere, although it seems like it's the
consensus among all kernel developers I've talked to.