Thread (31 messages) read the whole thread 31 messages, 6 authors, 2017-12-03

Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions

From: SF Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-28 08:50:20
Also in: dri-devel, kernel-janitors, linux-omap, lkml

quoted
quoted
quoted
It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests
according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for.
That's because you are pretty unresponsive to direction.
From which places did you get this impression?
Perhaps from the text that you have written only four lines below.
All comments are dismissed as "the usual mixture of disagreements and acceptance".
A mixture will always evolve.

* Some acceptance might not need further considerations.

* But the disagreements are remembered differently.
  They have got a potential for further improvements in some areas.

If you look at the patches sent by others, who learn from
the feedback provided to them,
I am also learning to some degree continuously.

there are not so many responses on the disagreements side.
How do you think about to look at the details for such an observation?

So the mixture is not usual.
I find that it can be also a matter of statistics.

Since you send lots of patches on the same issues,
Yes. - I am trying to fix some implementation details by the means
of source code analysis and corresponding transformation.
The patch count is still growing.

there should be no disagreements at all at this point.
I got an other impression. The probability for disagreements is increasing
in relation to the number of contributors to which I show change possibilities.

There are also other open issues remaining which can get another
solution somehow.

Regards,
Markus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help