Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] leds: add LM3533 LED driver
From: Johan Hovold <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-03 16:46:48
Also in:
linux-iio, lkml
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:51:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:50:59PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:quoted
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:43:44AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
+ 5 - 4.194 s + 6 - 8.389 s + 7 - 16.78 squoted
quoted
Shouldn't these be controlled by led_blink_set() rather than a custom ABI?quoted
led_blink_set controls the on/off times, but the LM3533 has the two additional rise and fall-time settings which determine the transition time between these states.Hrm. In that case these rise times are very large - I'd expect them to cause issues with led_set_blink() users?
They are. The default settings (as fast a transition as possible) will probably what most people use, and if they start fiddling with the transition times they probably know what they're doing.
Though actually I suspect the solution here is to pull these out into the framework later; we can probably simulate reasonably in software with a lot of brightness variable LEDs.
Ok.
quoted
quoted
quoted
+What: /sys/class/leds/<led>/max_currentquoted
quoted
Shouldn't this be set by platform data, the maximum current you can push through the LEDs seems like a board dependant thing which won't change dynamically at runtime. The brightness can already be varied.quoted
I fully agree and it is possible to set via the platform data for that reason. The end-customer, however, insisted that even this setting be available through sysfs to facilitate their integration and testing.quoted
I'd be willing drop this attribute if requested, as it would only be used during integration and could easily be added back by the end-customer if needed.I'd strongly suggest removing this for mainline. If it's present it should at least be limited to the maximum specified in platform data (just for safety if nothing else).
Agreed. Thanks, Johan