Re: framebuffer ioctl (fwd)
flat view
From: Otto Wyss <hidden>
Date: 2004-09-04 21:44:36
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Would there be any major opposition to my adding some additional functions to the framebuffer ioctl interface? I want to add basic drawing functions, nothing too fancy, but enough to do away with things like SVGAlib. Zack
IMO it should only be done if all of the graphic libs like SVGAlib, GGI, DirectFB can profit from it. IMO it's very important that the future API of the framebuffer in kernel 2.7.x is discussed before such changes are done. Maybe a wish list should be started. O. Wyss -- See a huge pile of work at "http://wyodesktop.sourceforge.net/" ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click