Re: Re: still ..Confused about atyfb and M1

From
James Simmons <hidden>
Date
2004-01-30 21:47:58
Reply to
Richard Smith, 2004-01-28
Can you submit a patch.


On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Richard Smith wrote:
Richard Smith wrote:
quoted
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
quoted
Mach64 MOBILITY M1 works by me for ages. I submitted all patches to 
James for months. They are in fbdev.diff.gz. But I dont think, they 
will be merged with vanilla very soon.
  I grabbed fbdev.diff.gz from infradead (is this the canonical source?) 
and patched my 2.6.1 tree.  But I still don't see my 0x4c52 device id 
listed in the tables.
And it still dosen't detect my device(s).

I never received an answer to this.  I don't see how the M1 can work 
supported when the device id isn't in the table.  Did I really get the 
latest patch?


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 6 authors, last reply 2004-02-09
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help