Re: Confused about atyfb status.
flat view
From: Jon Smirl <hidden>
Date: 2004-01-17 06:38:16
There is a fairly advanced one here: http://www.saftware.de/ but I don't know it's current status.
--- Richard Smith <rsmith@bitworks.com> wrote:I'm trying to use the atyfb on a Rage Mobility M1 but I'm confused on which source tree has the best chance of getting to work. Grepping through both the 2.4.24 and 2.6.1rc3 tree I find that the 2.4.24 tree has several references to a mobility M1 in the comments. The 2.6.1rc3 tree does not. Neither tree however has an entry for my device. Neither will detect my device which has an id of 0x4c52. If I copy one of the "3D RAGE Mobility" id lines and change the clocks to what I think they should be the device gets detected but various specifications (like ammount and type of RAM) are incorrect. So if I am about to start hacking on a tree to figure out whats wrong what tree should I use? Where is the most advanced tree for the atyfb located? -- Richard A. Smith rsmith@bitworks.com ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Linux-fbdev-devel mailing list Linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-fbdev-devel
===== Jon Smirl jonsmirl@yahoo.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn