Re: [PATCH v3 12/15] fanotify: Introduce FAN_FS_ERROR event

From
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Date
2021-06-30 14:05:04
Also in
linux-fsdevel
Reply to
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi, 2021-06-29
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 10:13 PM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
[off-list ref] wrote:
The FAN_FS_ERROR event is a new inode event used by filesystem wide
monitoring tools to receive notifications of type FS_ERROR_EVENT,
emitted directly by filesystems when a problem is detected.  The error
notification includes a generic error descriptor and a FID identifying
the file affected.

FID is sent for every FAN_FS_ERROR. Errors not linked to a regular inode
are reported against the root inode.

An error reporting structure is attached per-mark, and only a single
error can be stored at a time.  This is ok, since once an error occurs,
it is common for a stream of related errors to be reported.  We only log
accumulate the total of errors occurred since the last notification.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <redacted>

---
Changes since v2:
  - Support and equire FID mode (amir)
  - Goto error path instead of early return (amir)
  - Simplify get_one_event (me)
About that...
  - Base merging on error_count
  - drop fanotify_queue_error_event
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static int fanotify_merge_error_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
+                                     struct fsnotify_event *event)
+{
+       struct fanotify_event *fae = FANOTIFY_E(event);
+
+       /*
+        * When err_count > 0, the reporting slot is full.  Just account
+        * the additional error and abort the insertion.
+        */
+       if (atomic_fetch_inc(&FANOTIFY_EE(fae)->err_count) != 0)
+               return 1;
It feels a bit unsafe to bump err_count to 1 in merge() and set the error
info in insert(). feels like looking for trouble.
Maybe atomic_inc_not_zero() would have been better,
but since I am going to argue against modifying err_count outside
the notification_lock, it does not need to be atomic at all.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static void fanotify_insert_error_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
+                                       struct fsnotify_event *event,
+                                       const void *data)
+{
+       const struct fsnotify_event_info *ei =
+               (struct fsnotify_event_info *) data;
+       struct fanotify_event *fae = FANOTIFY_E(event);
+       const struct fs_error_report *report;
+       struct fanotify_error_event *fee;
+       struct inode *inode;
+       int fh_len;
+
+       /* This might be an unexpected type of event (i.e. overflow). */
+       if (!fanotify_is_error_event(fae->mask))
+               return;
+
+       report = (struct fs_error_report *) ei->data;
+       inode = report->inode ?: ei->sb->s_root->d_inode;
As I commented on the cover letter, I think it would be better to
encode a NULL-FID in case of NULL inode, e.g.:

static int fanotify_encode_null_fh(struct fanotify_fh *fh)
{
        fh->type = FILEID_ROOT;
        fh->len = 8;
        fh->flags = 0;
        memset(fh->buf, 0, 8);
}

But that API may be controversial, so wait for other voices
before changing that.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+       fee = FANOTIFY_EE(fae);
+       fee->fae.type = FANOTIFY_EVENT_TYPE_FS_ERROR;
+       fee->error = report->error;
+       fee->fsid = fee->mark->connector->fsid;
+
+       fsnotify_get_mark(fee->mark);
+
+       /*
+        * Error reporting needs to happen in atomic context.  If this
+        * inode's file handler is more than we initially predicted,
+        * there is nothing better we can do than report the error with
+        * a bad FH.
+        */
+       fh_len = fanotify_encode_fh_len(inode);
+       if (WARN_ON(fh_len > fee->max_fh_len))
+               return;
+
+       fanotify_encode_fh(&fee->object_fh, inode, fh_len, NULL, 0);
+}
+
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static size_t copy_error_info_to_user(struct fanotify_event *event,
+                                     char __user *buf, int count)
+{
+       struct fanotify_event_info_error info;
+       struct fanotify_error_event *fee = FANOTIFY_EE(event);
+
+       info.hdr.info_type = FAN_EVENT_INFO_TYPE_ERROR;
+       info.hdr.pad = 0;
+       info.hdr.len = sizeof(struct fanotify_event_info_error);
+
+       if (WARN_ON(count < info.hdr.len))
+               return -EFAULT;
+
+       info.error = fee->error;
+
+       /* This effectively releases the event for logging another error */
+       info.error_count = atomic_xchg(&fee->err_count, 0);
+
it's  a shame because the code is really simpler, but
I am afraid it may not be correct, even without mentioning breaking
the queue abstraction.

While the read/insert of err_count is "atomic", read of FID is done
after this point, not to mention that read of fee->error could be reordered
without barriers. FID and error could be set by insert event after reading
fee->err_count.

You can either go back to copying the error report to stack on dequeue
(though it was a bit ugly) under the group notification_lock
or you can allocate a new initialized error event on dequeue and
exchange it with the mark's event, without having to change the
calling semantics of get_one_event(), e.g.:

        fsnotify_remove_first_event(group);
        if (fanotify_is_perm_event(event->mask))
                FANOTIFY_PERM(event)->state = FAN_EVENT_REPORTED;
        if (fanotify_is_hashed_event(event->mask))
                fanotify_unhash_event(group, event);
+        if (fanotify_is_error_event(event->mask))
+                event = fanotify_recreate_fs_error_event(event);

If allocation fails, this helper returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
and resets the info and err_count of the event in the mark.

Thanks,
Amir.
Thread (54 messages) 54 messages, 5 authors, last reply 2021-07-08
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help