Thread (52 messages) 52 messages, 6 authors, 2021-03-12

Re: [PATCH v18 4/9] mm: hugetlb: alloc the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: 2021-03-10 15:20:48
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml

On Mon 08-03-21 18:28:02, Muchun Song wrote:
[...]
-static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
+static int update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
+	__releases(&hugetlb_lock) __acquires(&hugetlb_lock)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct page *subpage = page;
+	int nid = page_to_nid(page);
 
 	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h) && !gigantic_page_runtime_supported())
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	h->nr_huge_pages--;
-	h->nr_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]--;
+	h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
+	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(hugetlb_cgroup_from_page(page), page);
+	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(hugetlb_cgroup_from_page_rsvd(page), page);
+	set_page_refcounted(page);
+	set_compound_page_dtor(page, NULL_COMPOUND_DTOR);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the vmemmap pages associated with the HugeTLB page can be
+	 * optimized or the page is gigantic, we might block in
+	 * alloc_huge_page_vmemmap() or free_gigantic_page(). In both
+	 * cases, drop the hugetlb_lock.
+	 */
+	if (free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(h) || hstate_is_gigantic(h))
+		spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
+
+	if (alloc_huge_page_vmemmap(h, page)) {
+		spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
+		set_compound_page_dtor(page, HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
+		h->nr_huge_pages++;
+		h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
+
+		/*
+		 * If we cannot allocate vmemmap pages, just refuse to free the
+		 * page and put the page back on the hugetlb free list and treat
+		 * as a surplus page.
+		 */
+		h->surplus_huge_pages++;
+		h->surplus_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
+
+		/*
+		 * The refcount can possibly be increased by memory-failure or
+		 * soft_offline handlers.
This comment could be more helpful. I believe you want to say this
		/*
		 * HWpoisoning code can increment the reference
		 * count here. If there is a race then bail out
		 * the holder of the additional reference count will
		 * free up the page with put_page.
+		 */
+		if (likely(put_page_testzero(page))) {
+			arch_clear_hugepage_flags(page);
+			enqueue_huge_page(h, page);
+		}
+
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < pages_per_huge_page(h);
 	     i++, subpage = mem_map_next(subpage, page, i)) {
 		subpage->flags &= ~(1 << PG_locked | 1 << PG_error |
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1447,7 +1486,7 @@ void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
 	/*
 	 * Defer freeing if in non-task context to avoid hugetlb_lock deadlock.
 	 */
-	if (!in_task()) {
+	if (in_atomic()) {
As I've said elsewhere in_atomic doesn't work for CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=n.
We need this change for other reasons and so it would be better to pull
it out into a separate patch which also makes HUGETLB depend on
PREEMPT_COUNT.

[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1771,8 +1813,12 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
 		h->free_huge_pages--;
 		h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
 		h->max_huge_pages--;
-		update_and_free_page(h, head);
-		rc = 0;
+		rc = update_and_free_page(h, head);
+		if (rc) {
+			h->surplus_huge_pages--;
+			h->surplus_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
+			h->max_huge_pages++;
This is quite ugly and confusing. update_and_free_page is careful to do
the proper counters accounting and now you just override it partially.
Why cannot we rely on update_and_free_page do the right thing?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help