Hi Andy,
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 11:59:50AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 08:57:07AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 08:43:25PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 16:56:00 +0200
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
quoted
Just do not introduce that change (change of the ->name field) in the original
patch, in that case no revert churn would be needed.
I think this got dealt with in discussion of next version but
safest route is just have an extra copy of the name in the
chip_info structure. Then we know it's stable against different
firmware types etc.
Something like this?
Yes, but make it in the patch that introduces DT support.
Hm, I'm not sure what do you mean. There is no patch which "introduces
DT support" in this series. Do you mean, this one:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260204140045.390677-7-o.rempel@pengutronix.de/ (local)
Or should it be better a separate patch?
Best Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |