On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 08:57:07AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:

On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 08:43:25PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 16:56:00 +0200
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] wrote:

...

quoted

quoted

Just do not introduce that change (change of the ->name field) in the original
patch, in that case no revert churn would be needed.

I think this got dealt with in discussion of next version but
safest route is just have an extra copy of the name in the
chip_info structure.  Then we know it's stable against different
firmware types etc.

Something like this?

Yes, but make it in the patch that introduces DT support.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko