Hi Rob,

On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 18:42:59 -0600
Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:02:23PM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:

quoted

A framer can be connected to the QMC HDLC.
If present, this framer is the interface between the TDM used by the QMC
HDLC and the E1/T1 line.
The QMC HDLC can use this framer to get information about the line and
configure the line.

Add an optional framer property to reference the framer itself.

Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml
index 8bb6f34602d9..bf29863ab419 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml

@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ properties:
       Should be a phandle/number pair. The phandle to QMC node and the QMC
       channel to use.
 
+  framer:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle  

Now you've defined this property twice. Please avoid doing that.

I don't see what you mean.

I previously defined the framer property at the framer-codec node as it is
a framer consumer (it was a mistake because this framer-codec node is a child of
the framer node but that's an other story).

Here, at the qmc-hdlc node, I define this property in order to use the framer as a
consumer too.

What is wrong ?

Best regards,
Hervé

quoted

+    description:
+      phandle to the framer node
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - fsl,qmc-chan
-- 
2.41.0