Hi Rob,
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 18:42:59 -0600
Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:02:23PM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
quoted
A framer can be connected to the QMC HDLC.
If present, this framer is the interface between the TDM used by the QMC
HDLC and the E1/T1 line.
The QMC HDLC can use this framer to get information about the line and
configure the line.
Add an optional framer property to reference the framer itself.
Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml
index 8bb6f34602d9..bf29863ab419 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml
@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ properties:
Should be a phandle/number pair. The phandle to QMC node and the QMC
channel to use.
+ framer:
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
Now you've defined this property twice. Please avoid doing that.
I don't see what you mean.
I previously defined the framer property at the framer-codec node as it is
a framer consumer (it was a mistake because this framer-codec node is a child of
the framer node but that's an other story).
Here, at the qmc-hdlc node, I define this property in order to use the framer as a
consumer too.
What is wrong ?
Best regards,
Hervé
quoted
+ description:
+ phandle to the framer node
+
required:
- compatible
- fsl,qmc-chan
--
2.41.0