Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] clk: sifive: Add pcie_aux clock in prci driver for PCIe driver
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-05-04 16:23:36
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-pci, linux-riscv, lkml
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:24:19PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 06:59:35PM +0800, Greentime Hu wrote:quoted
We add pcie_aux clock in this patch so that pcie driver can use clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() to enable and disable pcie_aux clock. Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> --- drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.c | 11 +++++ drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.h | 2 +- drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++ drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.h | 9 ++++ include/dt-bindings/clock/sifive-fu740-prci.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.c b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.c index 764d1097aa51..53f6e00a03b9 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.c +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu740-prci.c@@ -72,6 +72,12 @@ static const struct clk_ops sifive_fu740_prci_hfpclkplldiv_clk_ops = { .recalc_rate = sifive_prci_hfpclkplldiv_recalc_rate,<...>quoted
+/* PCIE AUX clock APIs for enable, disable. */ +int sifive_prci_pcie_aux_clock_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)It should be bool
It's used via this function pointer:
struct clk_ops {
int (*is_enabled)(struct clk_hw *hw);
so I think "int" is actually appropriate here.
There are some weird/interesting bool vs int usages nearby, though:
"bool __is_clk_gate_enabled()" goes to some trouble to convert
int to bool ("return (reg_val & bit_mask) != 0;"), and then
kona_peri_clk_is_enabled() converts the bool back to int ("return
is_clk_gate_enabled(bcm_clk->ccu, gate) ? 1 : 0;").
"int lpc32xx_clk_gate_is_enabled()" actually returns a bool that is
implicitly converted to int.
Many *_is_enabled() functions return !!(...) where !! is an
int-to-bool conversion that is arguably unnecessary and again
results in an implicit conversion to int.
I don't see any *problems* with any of these; it just seems like a
little more mental effort to think about all the explicit and implicit
conversions going on.
quoted
+int sifive_prci_pcie_aux_clock_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct __prci_clock *pc = clk_hw_to_prci_clock(hw); + struct __prci_data *pd = pc->pd; + u32 r __maybe_unused; + + if (sifive_prci_pcie_aux_clock_is_enabled(hw)) + return 0;You actually call to this new function only once, put your __prci_readl() here.
Both sifive_prci_pcie_aux_clock_enable() and sifive_prci_pcie_aux_clock_is_enabled() are used via the clk_ops function pointers. Maybe sifive_prci_pcie_aux_clock_is_enabled() could be replaced by the __prci_readl() here, but I don't know enough about clk_ops internals to know. Bjorn