On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:44:15AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
[...]
+static void tegra_pwm_deinit_opp_table(void *data)
+{
+ struct device *dev = data;
+ struct opp_table *opp_table;
+
+ opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
+ dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
+ dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);
+ dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(opp_table);
+}
+
+static int devm_tegra_pwm_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct opp_table *opp_table;
+ const char *rname = "core";
+ int err;
+
+ /* voltage scaling is optional */
+ if (device_property_present(dev, "core-supply"))
+ opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, &rname, 1);
+ else
+ opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(opp_table),
+ "failed to prepare OPP table\n");
+
+ /*
+ * OPP table presence is optional and we want the set_rate() of OPP
+ * API to work similarly to clk_set_rate() if table is missing in a
+ * device-tree. The add_table() errors out if OPP is missing in DT.
+ */
+ if (device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2")) {
+ err = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to add OPP table: %d\n", err);
+ goto put_table;
+ }
+ }
+
+ err = devm_add_action(dev, tegra_pwm_deinit_opp_table, dev);
+ if (err)
+ goto remove_table;
+
+ return 0;
+
+remove_table:
+ dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
+put_table:
+ dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);
+
+ return err;
+}
These two functions seem to be heavily boilerplate across all these
drivers. Have you considered splitting these out into separate helpers?
Thierry