Re: [1/3] rtc/fsl: support flextimer for lx2160a
From: Trent Piepho <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-23 16:56:41
Also in:
linux-rtc, lkml
On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 17:57 +0800, Biwen Li wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The patch supports flextimer for lx2160a Signed-off-by: Biwen Li <redacted> --- drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c index 4f7259c2d6a3..2b81525f6db8 100644--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c@@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ftm_rtc_match[]= { { .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-ftm-alarm", }, { .compatible = "fsl,ls208xa-ftm-alarm", }, { .compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-ftm-alarm", }, + { .compatible = "fsl,lx2160a-ftm-alarm", }, { }, };
Since there's no data associated with each compatible, it doesn't seem
like there's any need to add a new one.
What's normally done is add two compatibles in the dts, the base
version and the specific version, e.g.:
+ rcpm: rcpm@1e34040 {
+ compatible = "fsl,lx2160a-rcpm", "fsl,qoriq-cpm-2.1+";
Or in this case, compatible = "fsl,lx2160a-ftm-alarm", "fsl,ls1088a-ftm-alarm";
Then there's no need to add to the driver list.