Re: [PATCH v3 01/30] mfd: Makefile: Remove build option for MFD:sun4i-gpadc
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-09-02 19:58:56
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-iio, lkml
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-09-02 19:58:56
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-iio, lkml
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:25:45 +0200 Maxime Ripard [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Philipp, First, thanks for doing that rework. It was needed, and it's very much appreciated :) As you can imagine though, I have a bunch of comments. On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 05:44:49PM +0200, Philipp Rossak wrote:quoted
Since we are merging the mfd driver into the sun4i-gpadc driver we need to remove the build options for the sun4i-gpadc driver. Signed-off-by: Philipp Rossak <redacted> --- drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile index e9fd20dba18d..c680994db988 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile@@ -220,7 +220,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CHTDC_TI) += intel_soc_pmic_chtdc_ti.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MT6397) += mt6397-core.o obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ALTERA_A10SR) += altera-a10sr.o -obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SUN4I_GPADC) += sun4i-gpadc.oOne of the things we should strive for is bisectability, which means being able to have a working driver at every point in time while introducing the features. In this particular case, this isn't really a problem since you're removing part of code that were never really enabled, but you should at least document why in your commit log.
Agreed. I for one don't know / can't remember why this would make sense! Jonathan
Thanks! Maxime