Re: [PATCH v2 18/23] dt-bindings: thermal: armada: add reference to new bindings
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Date: 2018-07-05 10:05:28
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm
Hi Rob, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote on Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:30:11 -0600:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 05:12:34PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:quoted
New bindings (with the syscon and the overheat interrupt) are availableWhat interrupt? It's not in your new binding.quoted
for AP806 and CP110 compatibles. Add a reference to these files from the original documentation. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt index e0d013a2e66d..f3b441100890 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@ Required properties: * marvell,armada-ap806-thermal * marvell,armada-cp110-thermalReally you should not be using the same compatible for both. Now you have 2 drivers matching to same compatibles. Can't you make this a child of the syscon without breaking the binding?
We are talking about only 1 driver here, so I'm not sure how I should understand your last sentence. Do you want me to add a second compatible (for the same piece of hardware) for thermal node declared as a child of the syscon? I could handle this situation in the driver by creating the missing regmap in case we are using the old compatible. If this is the solution you prefer, how should I name the new compatibles ?
quoted
+Note: these bindings are deprecated for AP806/CP110 and should instead +follow the rules described in: +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt + - reg: Device's register space. Two entries are expected, see the examples below. The first one points to the status register (4B). The second one points to the control -- 2.14.1
Thanks, Miquèl _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel