Re: [PATCH v11 5/8] i2c: fsi: Add transfer implementation
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2018-07-10 23:40:03
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2018-07-10 23:40:03
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 12:52 -0500, Eddie James wrote:
On 07/09/2018 05:41 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:quoted
quoted
+ cmd |= FIELD_PREP(I2C_CMD_ADDR, msg->addr >> 1);I just noticed this and wonder: Don't you need the LSB of the address? It is not the RW flag, this is encoded in msg->flags.So, the hardware interprets the LSB as the RW flag. It wouldn't be possible to have a device addressed with the LSB set on this I2C master.
What do you mean ? That doesn't sound right...
quoted
Also, no seperate handling for 10 bit addresses? Technically, 7-bit 0x50 is different on the wire from 10-bit 0x050. This is minor, though. There are no 10-bit devices out there. Still, did you test 10-bit support?Indeed, real 10-bit addresses require some additional manipulation of this I2C master in order to work. We don't support it right now. Thanks, Eddiequoted
Rest looks good.