Re: [PATCH 4/7] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support for get/set performance state
From: Rajendra Nayak <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-16 05:52:12
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
On 03/16/2018 10:05 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 16-03-18, 09:38, Rajendra Nayak wrote:quoted
With genpd now expecting powerdomain drivers supporting performance state to support get/set performance state callbacks, add support for it in the rpmpd driver. Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <redacted> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c index c8754d867c33..4058c5b450c6 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/of_device.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h> #include <linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h> #include <dt-bindings/mfd/qcom-rpm.h>@@ -29,6 +30,8 @@ #define KEY_ENABLE 0x6e657773 /* swen */ #define KEY_FLOOR_CORNER 0x636676 /* vfc */ +#define MAX_RPMPD_STATE 6 + #define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORN_SMPA(_platform, _name, _active, r_id) \ static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_active; \ static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = { \@@ -222,6 +225,43 @@ static int rpmpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) return ret; } +static int rpmpd_set_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *domain, + unsigned int state) +{ + int ret = 0; + struct rpmpd *pd = domain_to_rpmpd(domain); + + mutex_lock(&rpmpd_lock); + + if (state > MAX_RPMPD_STATE) + goto out; + + pd->corner = state; + + if (!pd->enabled && (pd->key != KEY_FLOOR_CORNER)) + goto out; + + ret = rpmpd_aggregate_corner(pd); + +out: + mutex_unlock(&rpmpd_lock); + + return ret; +} + +static unsigned int rpmpd_get_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, + struct dev_pm_opp *opp) +{ + struct device_node *np; + unsigned int corner = 0; + + np = dev_pm_opp_get_of_node(opp); + of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,level", &corner);Don't we want to error out or do something else in case of an error ?
yes, I missed the error checks, will add. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation