Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 6 authors, 2018-04-10

Re: [PATCH 4/7] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support for get/set performance state

From: Rajendra Nayak <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-16 05:52:12
Also in: linux-arm-msm, lkml


On 03/16/2018 10:05 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 16-03-18, 09:38, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
quoted
With genpd now expecting powerdomain drivers supporting performance
state to support get/set performance state callbacks, add support for it
in the rpmpd driver.

Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
index c8754d867c33..4058c5b450c6 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
 #include <linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h>
 
 #include <dt-bindings/mfd/qcom-rpm.h>
@@ -29,6 +30,8 @@
 #define KEY_ENABLE		0x6e657773 /* swen */
 #define KEY_FLOOR_CORNER	0x636676   /* vfc */
 
+#define MAX_RPMPD_STATE		6
+
 #define DEFINE_RPMPD_CORN_SMPA(_platform, _name, _active, r_id)		\
 	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_active;			\
 	static struct rpmpd _platform##_##_name = {			\
@@ -222,6 +225,43 @@ static int rpmpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int rpmpd_set_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *domain,
+			     unsigned int state)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct rpmpd *pd = domain_to_rpmpd(domain);
+
+	mutex_lock(&rpmpd_lock);
+
+	if (state > MAX_RPMPD_STATE)
+		goto out;
+
+	pd->corner = state;
+
+	if (!pd->enabled && (pd->key != KEY_FLOOR_CORNER))
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = rpmpd_aggregate_corner(pd);
+
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&rpmpd_lock);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static unsigned int rpmpd_get_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
+					  struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
+{
+	struct device_node *np;
+	unsigned int corner = 0;
+
+	np = dev_pm_opp_get_of_node(opp);
+	of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,level", &corner);
Don't we want to error out or do something else in case of an error ?
yes, I missed the error checks, will add.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help