Hi Rob,

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

quoted

Some "atmel,at25" compatible SPI EEPROMs (e.g. Microchip 25lc040) use an
odd number of address bits.  This patch series adds support for
instantiating such devices from DT.

Do EEPROMs using 17 or 25 address bits, as mentioned in
include/linux/spi/eeprom.h, really exist?
Or should we just limit it to a single odd value (9 bits)?

This has been tested with a bunch of 25lc040 EEPROMs.

Thanks!

Geert Uytterhoeven (3):
  eeprom: at25: Add DT support for EEPROMs with odd address bits
  dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Grammar s/are can/can/
  dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Document device-specific compatible values

2 and 3 are fixes and I'll apply for 4.15 if you don't mind.

Thanks, I don't mind.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html