Le 8 mars 2016 à 09:54, Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Färber [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Drop #address-cells and #size-cells, which are not required by the
gpio-keys binding documentation, as button sub-nodes are not devices.
Reported-by: Julien Chauveau <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
index 21641236c095..1552a11f6786 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ Example nodes:
gpio_keys {
compatible = "gpio-keys";
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <0>;
autorepeat;
button@21 {
FYI, with "[PATCH] scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version 53bf130b1cdd":
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg117206.html) applied:
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /keyboard/button@21 has a unit
name, but no reg property
Hi Andreas,
This means you can also drop the unit-address (the @21 part) for the button.
What about using a more relevant name like "key_up" instead of "button"?
Julien--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html