Am 28.07.2014 14:20, schrieb Mark Brown:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:43:02PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
quoted
Am 25.07.2014 12:39, schrieb Mark Brown:
quoted
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:32:43PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Maybe this works for you?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4620191/
quoted
quoted
quoted
Otherwise I can resend with Ab/Rb.
quoted
quoted
Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
quoted
Not helpful here, nor is
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt. It's separate
from code changes, sent via git-send-email, has a Sob, went to LKML and
LAKML and DTML. I could add a Fixes: header and CC trivial for this
one-line fix IIUC.
It's telling you that the kernel process is to review patches sent via
e-mail, not random links to web appliations - notice the context to
which I'm replying, I'm saying that sending a link to something on the
web isn't a good way of submitting a patch.
quoted
Doesn't tell me which patches I should CC you on in the future though.
Therefore my request to fix the false negative in MAINTAINERS so that me
and other kernel newbies don't run into it again.
Feel free to submit patches if you want to see changes.
Dude, this patch *was* submitted and has been reviewed by two people.
Don't pretend I didn't follow the SubmittingPatches workflow.
The link I gave you contains an mbox-format link that can be used with
wget and git-am to *apply* the patch if you apparently missed it on the
mailing lists.
I will *re*-submit it for your convenience.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg