Hi Andreas,
On 07/25/2014 10:46 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi Michal,
Am 25.07.2014 09:49, schrieb Michal Simek:
quoted
On 07/25/2014 01:00 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
quoted
The specification requires xlnx,data-width, but example and driver use
xlnx,datawidth. Change the specification to match the implementation.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
---
v2: New
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_vdma.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_vdma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_vdma.txt
index 1405ed0..e4c4d47 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_vdma.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_vdma.txt
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Required child node properties:
- compatible: It should be either "xlnx,axi-vdma-mm2s-channel" or
"xlnx,axi-vdma-s2mm-channel".
- interrupts: Should contain per channel VDMA interrupts.
-- xlnx,data-width: Should contain the stream data width, take values
+- xlnx,datawidth: Should contain the stream data width, take values
{32,64...1024}.
BTW I just notice that this values specification is ambiguous as to
whether 96 is a valid value or only powers of 2 like 128. Maybe you want
to clarify that in a follow-up patch?
really appreciate your help for improving this.
Srikanth T: Can you please look at it?
Thanks,
Michal