Re: [PATCH] x86/crypto: Add missing RETs
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-07-05 07:58:28
Also in:
lkml
* Josh Poimboeuf [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
So that's still incomplete in that doesn't analyze the 32-bit build yet, right?We could do INT3s on 64-bit and NOPs on 32-bit. Or, possibly even better, we could just keep NOPs everywhere and instead make objtool smart enough to detect function fallthroughs. That should be pretty easy, actually. It already does it for C files. Something like the below should work, though it's still got a few issues: a) objtool is currently disabled for crypto code because it doesn't yet understand crypto stack re-alignments (which really needs fixing anyway); and b) it complains about the blank xen hypercalls falling through. Those aren't actual functions anyway, so we should probably annotate those somehow so that objtool ignores them anyway. I'm a bit swamped at the moment but I can fix those once I get a little more bandwidth. I at least verified that this patch caught the crypto missing RETs.
Great, I'd be perfectly fine with such an approach. Also, if we have that then we could re-apply Alexey's patch and switch to INT3 (only on 64-bit kernels) without any trouble, because objtool should detect any execution flow bugs before the INT3 could trigger, right? I.e. any INT3 fault would show a combination of *both* an objtool bug and a probable code flow bug - which I suspect would warrant crashing the box ... Thanks, Ingo