Re: [patch] crypto: sha256-mb - cleanup a || vs | typo
From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-30 07:51:21
Also in:
kernel-janitors, lkml
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:05:53AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/29/16 07:42, Dan Carpenter wrote:quoted
|| and | behave basically the same here but || is intended. It causes a static checker warning to mix up bitwise and logical operations. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c b/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c index c9d5dcc..4ec895a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static struct sha256_hash_ctx *sha256_ctx_mgr_submit(struct sha256_ctx_mgr *mgr, * Or if the user's buffer contains less than a whole block, * append as much as possible to the extra block. */ - if ((ctx->partial_block_buffer_length) | (len < SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE)) { + if ((ctx->partial_block_buffer_length) || (len < SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE)) { /* Compute how many bytes to copy from user buffer into * extra block */As far as I know the | was an intentional optimization, so you may way to look at the generated code.
I know how the rules work. I just thought it looked more like a typo than an optimization. It's normally a typo. It's hard to tell the intent. I think I'll modify my static checker to ignore these since the typo is harmless. regards, dan carpenter