Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] can: bittiming: allow TDC{V,O} to be zero and add can_tdc_const::tdc{v,o,f}_min
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2021-08-16 12:25:31
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On 16.08.2021 19:24:43, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
On Mon. 16 Aug 2021 at 17:42, Marc Kleine-Budde [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 15.08.2021 12:32:43, Vincent Mailhol wrote:quoted
ISO 11898-1 specifies in section 11.3.3 "Transmitter delay compensation" that "the configuration range for [the] SSP position shall be at least 0 to 63 minimum time quanta." Because SSP = TDCV + TDCO, it means that we should allow both TDCV and TDCO to hold zero value in order to honor SSP's minimum possible value. However, current implementation assigned special meaning to TDCV and TDCO's zero values: * TDCV = 0 -> TDCV is automatically measured by the transceiver. * TDCO = 0 -> TDC is off. In order to allow for those values to really be zero and to maintain current features, we introduce two new flags: * CAN_CTRLMODE_TDC_AUTO indicates that the controller support automatic measurement of TDCV. * CAN_CTRLMODE_TDC_MANUAL indicates that the controller support manual configuration of TDCV. N.B.: current implementation failed to provide an option for the driver to indicate that only manual mode was supported. TDC is disabled if both CAN_CTRLMODE_TDC_AUTO and CAN_CTRLMODE_TDC_MANUAL flags are off, c.f. the helper function can_tdc_is_enabled() which is also introduced in this patch.Nitpick: We can only say that TDC is disabled, if the driver supports the TDC interface at all, which is the case if tdc_const is set.I would argue that saying that a device does not support TDC is equivalent to saying that TDC is always disabled for that device. Especially, the function can_tdc_is_enabled() can be used even if the device does not support TDC (even if there is no benefit doing so). Do you still want me to rephrase this part?quoted
quoted
Also, this patch adds three fields: tdcv_min, tdco_min and tdcf_min to struct can_tdc_const. While we are not convinced that those three fields could be anything else than zero, we can imagine that some controllers might specify a lower bound on these. Thus, those minimums are really added "just in case".I'm not sure, if we talked about the mcp251xfd's tcdo, valid values are -64...63.Yes! Stefan shed some light on this. The mcp251xfd uses a tdco value which is relative to the sample point.
I don't read the documentation this way....
| SSP = TDCV + absolute TDCO | = TDCV + SP + relative TDCO Consequently: | relative TDCO = absolute TDCO - SP
In the mcp15xxfd family manual (http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/MCP251XXFD-CAN-FD-Controller-Module-Family-Reference-Manual-20005678B.pdf) in the 2mbit/s data bit rate example in table 3-5 (page 21) it says: | DTSEG1 15 DTQ | DTSEG2 4 DTQ | TDCO 15 DTQ The mcp251xfd driver uses 15, the framework calculates 16 (== Sync Seg+ tseg1, which is correct), and relative tdco would be 0: | mcp251xfd_set_bittiming: tdco=15, priv->tdc.tdc=16, relative_tdco=0 Here the output with the patched ip tool: | 4: mcp251xfd0: <NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP,ECHO> mtu 72 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 10 | link/can promiscuity 0 minmtu 0 maxmtu 0 | can <FD,TDC_AUTO> state ERROR-ACTIVE (berr-counter tx 0 rx 0) restart-ms 100 | bitrate 500000 sample-point 0.875 | tq 25 prop-seg 34 phase-seg1 35 phase-seg2 10 sjw 1 brp 1 | mcp251xfd: tseg1 2..256 tseg2 1..128 sjw 1..128 brp 1..256 brp_inc 1 | dbitrate 2000000 dsample-point 0.750 | dtq 25 dprop-seg 7 dphase-seg1 7 dphase-seg2 5 dsjw 1 dbrp 1 | tdco 15 | mcp251xfd: dtseg1 1..32 dtseg2 1..16 dsjw 1..16 dbrp 1..256 dbrp_inc 1 | tdco 0..127 | clock 40000000 numtxqueues 1 numrxqueues 1 gso_max_size 65536 gso_max_segs 65535 parentbus spi parentdev spi0.0
Which is also why TDCO can be negative. I added an helper function can_tdc_get_relative_tdco() in the fourth path of this series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20210814091750.73931-5-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr/T/#u (local) Devices which use the absolute TDCO can directly use can_priv->tdc.tdco. Devices which use the relative TDCO such as the mcp251xfd should use this helper function instead.
Don't think so....
However, you will still need to convert the TDCO valid range from relative values to absolute ones. In your case 0..127.
Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 488 bytes