Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] can: kvaser_usb: Add support for the Usbcan-II family
From: Ahmed S. Darwish <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-12 12:36:45
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 07:07:41AM -0500, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
Hi Marc, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:43:56PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:quoted
On 01/11/2015 09:36 PM, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:quoted
+ + switch (dev->family) { + case KVASER_LEAF: + rx_msg = msg->u.leaf.rx_can.msg; + break; + case KVASER_USBCAN: + rx_msg = msg->u.usbcan.rx_can.msg; + break; + default: + dev_err(dev->udev->dev.parent, + "Invalid device family (%d)\n", dev->family); return;should not happen.Yes, but otherwise I get GCC warnings of 'rx_msg' possibly being unused. I can add __maybe_unused to rx_msg of course, but such annotation may hide possible errors in the future.
Ah, what I meant is using uninitialized_var() to suppress the GCC warning. But, really, using that macro has a bad history of hiding errors in the future. Kindly check http://lwn.net/Articles/529954/ for context. Another solution might be initializing rx_msg to NULL.
quoted
quoted
+ switch (dev->family) { + case KVASER_LEAF: + msg_tx_can_flags = &msg->u.tx_can.leaf.flags; + break; + case KVASER_USBCAN: + msg_tx_can_flags = &msg->u.tx_can.usbcan.flags; + break; + default: + dev_err(dev->udev->dev.parent, + "Invalid device family (%d)\n", dev->family); + goto releasebuf;should not happen, please removeLike the 'rx_msg' case above. Thanks, Darwish