Re: kernel panic happens when disconnecting Bluetooth headset
flat view
From: Nick Pelly <hidden>
Date: 2009-12-18 22:30:56
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Marcel Holtmann [off-list ref] wrot= e:
Hi Andrei,quoted
Processing a RFCOMM UA frame when the socket is closed and we were not the RFCOMM initiator would cause rfcomm_session_put() to be called twice during rfcomm_process_rx(). This would cause a kernel panic in rfcomm_session_close. This could be easily reproduced during disconnect with devices such as Motorola H270 that send RFCOMM UA followed quickly by L2CAP disconnect request. This hcidump for this looks like: 2009-09-21 17:22:37.788895 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0L2CAP(d): cid 0x0041 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0RFCOMM(s): DISC: cr 0 dlci 20 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x7d 2009-09-21 17:22:37.906204 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 =A0 =A0handle 1 packets 1 2009-09-21 17:22:37.933090 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0RFCOMM(s): UA: cr 0 dlci 20 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x57 2009-09-21 17:22:38.636764 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0L2CAP(d): cid 0x0041 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0RFCOMM(s): DISC: cr 0 dlci 0 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x9c 2009-09-21 17:22:38.744125 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 =A0 =A0handle 1 packets 1 2009-09-21 17:22:38.763687 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0RFCOMM(s): UA: cr 0 dlci 0 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0xb6 2009-09-21 17:22:38.783554 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 12 =A0 =A0L2CAP(s): Disconn req: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0041 Avoid calling rfcomm_session_put() twice by skipping this call in rfcomm_recv_ua() if the socket is closed. Picked from: http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=3Dkernel/common.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3D1048=
e007842da2d6440679e1ca80f45438a6369d
quoted
Signed-off-by: Nick Pelly <redacted> Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <redacted> --- =A0net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c | =A0 =A03 ++- =A01 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c index 0313e88..56ffcb8 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c@@ -1148,7 +1148,8 @@ static int rfcomm_recv_ua(struct rfcomm_session*s, u8 dlci) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 break; =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 case BT_DISCONN: - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 rfcomm_session_put(s); + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if (s->sock->sk->sk_state =
!=3D BT_CLOSED)
quoted
+ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 rfcomm_ses=
sion_put(s);
quoted
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 break; =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 } =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 }I am not a big fan of conditionally decreasing reference counts. I do think it would be better to fix this by holding an extra pair of reference counts or actually fixing the imbalance. What about the other patches I proposed?
Your proposed patch was to add an extra hold() / put() reference count around the offending put(). I did test this patch, and found it does not fix the underlying imbalance, it just moves the kernel panic somewhere else. As best I can tell, my patch does address the underlying imbalance. It is in production on Android phones and seems to work well. As best I can tell, there is not a cleaner solution that does not involve significant refactoring of rfcomm refcounting. Nick