Re: kernel panic happens when disconnecting Bluetooth headset
From: Andrei Emeltchenko <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-18 08:06:52
Hi, On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Marcel Holtmann [off-list ref] wrot= e:
Hi Nick,quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
We met a issue that kernel panic happens when disconnecting some =
kinds
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
of Bluetooth headset, then we did some analysis and made some cha=
nges
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
on kernel code which have avoided the panic happening. Would you please help to check if our analysis and fix is correct? =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Issue description =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D On Android platform(kernel 2.6.29), disconnecting Bluetooth heads=
et
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
may cause kernel panic on certain conditions. (Pre-condition is android paired with headset.) Initiate the connection from android, disconnect it from android,=
result is OK.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Initiate the connection from android, disconnect it from headset,=
result is OK.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Initiate the connection from headset, disconnect it from headset,=
result is OK.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Initiate the connection from headset, disconnect it from android,=
for
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Motorola H12 headset, result is OK. Initiate the connection from headset, disconnect it from android,=
for
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Motorola H620/560 headset, result is kernel panic. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Kernel panic point =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D kernel panic at __list_del() in the function rfcomm_session_del()=
,
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
panic reason is "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtua=
l
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
address 00200200" =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Kernel log analysis =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D rfcomm_session_del() is still called after the session entry is removed from the list. Then __list_del() will cause kernel panic because of the incorrect pointer. This situation occurs when call=
ing
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
rfcomm_recv_ua() when the socket state is BT_CLOSED . So we need =
to
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
find out why the socket state become BT_CLOSED before we calling rfcomm_recv_ua(). # [ =A0171.677429] rfcomm_sock_sendmsg: sock ce9a0960, sk cc5c4c0=
0
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0171.683532] rfcomm_dlc_send: dlc cd3fe920 mtu 255 len 14 [ =A0171.689422] rfcomm_process_rx: session cc751be0 state 1 qlen=
0
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0171.695709] rfcomm_process_rx: @@@ @@@ sk_state =3D 1 [ =A0171.701110] rfcomm_process_dlcs: session cc751be0 state 1 [ =A0171.706939] rfcomm_process_tx: dlc cd3fe920 state 1 cfc 40 rx_credits 33 tx_credits 31 [ =A0171.715515] rfcomm_send_frame: session cc751be0 len 18 [ =A0171.721130] rfcomm_session_put: in rfcomm_session_put, s->re=
fcnt =3D 3
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.127807] rfcomm_sock_sendmsg: sock ce9a0960, sk cc5c4c00 [ =A0174.134490] rfcomm_dlc_send: dlc cd3fe920 mtu 255 len 6 [ =A0174.141540] rfcomm_process_rx: session cc751be0 state 1 qlen=
0
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.148498] rfcomm_process_rx: @@@ @@@ sk_state =3D 1 [ =A0174.154968] rfcomm_process_dlcs: session cc751be0 state 1 [ =A0174.161437] rfcomm_process_tx: dlc cd3fe920 state 1 cfc 40 rx_credits 33 tx_credits 30 [ =A0174.171173] rfcomm_send_frame: session cc751be0 len 10 [ =A0174.177642] rfcomm_session_put: in rfcomm_session_put, s->re=
fcnt =3D 3
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.205932] rfcomm_sock_release: sock ce9a0960, sk cc5c4c00 [ =A0174.212707] rfcomm_sock_shutdown: sock ce9a0960, sk cc5c4c00 [ =A0174.220031] __rfcomm_sock_close: sk cc5c4c00 state 1 socket =
ce9a0960
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.227508] __rfcomm_dlc_close: dlc cd3fe920 state 1 dlci 20=
err 0
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
session cc751be0 [ =A0174.236877] rfcomm_send_disc: cc751be0 dlci 20 [ =A0174.242706] rfcomm_send_frame: session cc751be0 len 4 [ =A0174.248962] rfcomm_dlc_set_timer: dlc cd3fe920 state 8 timeo=
ut 2560
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.256835] rfcomm_sock_kill: sk cc5c4c00 state 1 refcnt 2 [ =A0174.263336] rfcomm_sock_destruct: sk cc5c4c00 dlc cd3fe920 [ =A0174.399444] rfcomm_l2data_ready: ccf70400 bytes 4 [ =A0174.404724] rfcomm_process_rx: session cc751be0 state 1 qlen=
1
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.411010] rfcomm_process_rx: @@@ @@@ sk_state =3D 1 [ =A0174.416412] rfcomm_recv_ua: session cc751be0 state 1 dlci 20 [ =A0174.422515] __rfcomm_dlc_close: dlc cd3fe920 state 9 dlci 20=
err 0
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
session cc751be0 [ =A0174.430816] rfcomm_dlc_clear_timer: dlc cd3fe920 state 9 [ =A0174.436553] rfcomm_dlc_unlink: dlc cd3fe920 refcnt 1 session=
cc751be0
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.443572] rfcomm_dlc_free: cd3fe920 [ =A0174.447570] rfcomm_session_put: in rfcomm_session_put, s->re=
fcnt =3D 3
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.454528] rfcomm_send_disc: cc751be0 dlci 0 [ =A0174.459259] rfcomm_send_frame: session cc751be0 len 4 [ =A0174.464904] rfcomm_process_dlcs: session cc751be0 state 8 [ =A0174.470703] rfcomm_session_put: in rfcomm_session_put, s->re=
fcnt =3D 2
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.898284] rfcomm_l2data_ready: ccf70400 bytes 4 [ =A0174.903442] rfcomm_l2state_change: ccf70400 state 9 [ =A0174.908874] rfcomm_process_rx: session cc751be0 state 8 qlen=
1
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.915130] rfcomm_process_rx: @@@ @@@ sk_state =3D 9 [ =A0174.920562] rfcomm_recv_ua: session cc751be0 state 8 dlci 0 [ =A0174.926574] rfcomm_session_put: in rfcomm_session_put, s->re=
fcnt =3D 2
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.933532] rfcomm_process_rx: @@@ @@@ sk_state =3D=3D BT_CL=
OSED , s->initiator=3D0
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.941253] rfcomm_session_put: in rfcomm_session_put, s->re=
fcnt =3D 1
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.948211] rfcomm_session_del: session cc751be0 state 8 [ =A0174.953918] @@@@ in rfcomm_session_del() [ =A0174.958312] @@@@ s->list =3D cc751be0 [ =A0174.962097] @@@@ s->list.next =3D ccbfe9a0 [ =A0174.966369] @@@@ s->list.prev =3D c047d524 [ =A0174.970733] @@@@ list is valid, call list_del() [ =A0174.975646] @@@@ after list_del() [ =A0174.979278] @@@@ s->list =3D cc751be0 [ =A0174.983184] @@@@ s->list.next =3D 00100100 [ =A0174.987457] @@@@ s->list.prev =3D 00200200 [ =A0174.991729] rfcomm_session_close: session cc751be0 state 8 e=
rr 104
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0174.998504] rfcomm_session_put: in rfcomm_session_put, s->re=
fcnt =3D 1
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0175.005310] rfcomm_session_del: session cc751be0 state 9 [ =A0175.011169] @@@@ in rfcomm_session_del() [ =A0175.015441] @@@@ s->list =3D cc751be0 [ =A0175.019409] @@@@ s->list.next =3D 00100100 [ =A0175.023651] @@@@ s->list.prev =3D 00200200 [ =A0175.027923] @@@@ list is valid, call list_del() [ =A0175.032958] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtua=
l
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
address 00200200 [ =A0175.040679] pgd =3D c0004000 [ =A0175.043792] [00200200] *pgd=3D00000000 [ =A0175.047821] Internal error: Oops: 817 [#1] [ =A0175.052246] Modules linked in: [ =A0175.055725] CPU: 0 =A0 =A0Not tainted =A0(2.6.29-omap1-dirty=
#34)
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0175.061859] PC is at rfcomm_session_del+0x6c/0x108 [ =A0175.067047] LR is at release_console_sem+0x190/0x1a0 [ =A0175.072509] pc : [<c033ded8>] =A0 =A0lr : [<c0066308>] =A0 =
=A0psr: 60000013
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0175.072509] sp : cc1abf38 =A0ip : cc1abe68 =A0fp : cc1abf4c [ =A0175.084960] r10: cc751c04 =A0r9 : c036d2fc =A0r8 : cc751be0 [ =A0175.090545] r7 : 00000068 =A0r6 : cc751c04 =A0r5 : 00000009 =
=A0r4 : cc751be0
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
[ =A0175.097656] r3 : 00100100 =A0r2 : 00100100 =A0r1 : 00200200 =
=A0r0 : c0422876
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D HCI log analysis =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Compare the hcidump log of the correct case with the one of the p=
anic
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
case, we found there is only one difference in the message sequen=
ce.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
In the panic case, headset send L2CAP Disconn_Req immediately aft=
er
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
sending rfcomm UA frame to android. We think this is the reason t=
hat
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
cause the socket state become BT_CLOSED. Please compare these two log, pay attention to the message direct=
ion
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
of the last Disconn_Req. Log of correct case: ---------------------------- 009-09-10 15:27:28.963519 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 22 =A0 =A0L2CAP(d): cid 0x0047 len 18 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0RFCOMM(d): UIH: cr 0 dlci 20 pf 0 ilen 14 fcs 0xeb =A0 =A0 =A00000: 0d 0a 2b 43 49 45 56 3a =A020 37 2c 33 0d 0a =A0=
=A0 =A0 =A0..+CIEV: 7,3..
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
009-09-10 15:27:28.967272 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packet=
s (0x13) plen
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0handle 1 packets 1 009-09-10 15:27:29.243945 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0L2CAP(d): cid 0x0047 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0RFCOMM(s): DISC: cr 0 dlci 20 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x7d 009-09-10 15:27:29.247363 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packet=
s (0x13) plen
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0handle 1 packets 1 009-09-10 15:27:29.274890 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0RFCOMM(s): UA: cr 0 dlci 20 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x57 009-09-10 15:27:29.296343 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0L2CAP(d): cid 0x0047 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0RFCOMM(s): DISC: cr 0 dlci 0 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x9c 009-09-10 15:27:29.298480 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packet=
s (0x13) plen
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0handle 1 packets 1 009-09-10 15:27:29.319873 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0RFCOMM(s): UA: cr 0 dlci 0 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0xb6 009-09-10 15:27:29.320727 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 12 =A0 =A0L2CAP(s): Disconn req: dcid 0x0047 scid 0x0040 009-09-10 15:27:29.323474 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packet=
s (0x13) plen
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0handle 1 packets 1 009-09-10 15:27:29.337237 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 12 =A0 =A0L2CAP(s): Disconn rsp: dcid 0x0047 scid 0x0040 log of panic case: ------------------------ 2009-09-10 13:34:24.020208 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 2=
2
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0041 len 18 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0 RFCOMM(d): UIH: cr 0 dlci 20 pf 0 ilen 14 fcs 0xeb =A0 =A0 =A0 0000: 0d 0a 2b 43 49 45 56 3a =A020 37 2c 33 0d 0a =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0..+CIEV: 7,3..
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
2009-09-10 13:34:24.281256 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packe=
ts (0x13) plen
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
5 =A0 =A0 handle 1 packets 1 2009-09-10 13:34:24.083580 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0041 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0 RFCOMM(s): DISC: cr 0 dlci 20 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x7d 2009-09-10 13:34:24.529442 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packe=
ts (0x13) plen
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
5 =A0 =A0 handle 1 packets 1 2009-09-10 13:34:24.531914 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0 RFCOMM(s): UA: cr 0 dlci 20 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x57 2009-09-10 13:34:24.533135 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0041 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0 RFCOMM(s): DISC: cr 0 dlci 0 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x9c 2009-09-10 13:34:25.028649 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packe=
ts (0x13) plen
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
5 =A0 =A0 handle 1 packets 1 2009-09-10 13:34:25.032128 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 =A0 =A0 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 4 [psm 3] =A0 =A0 =A0 RFCOMM(s): UA: cr 0 dlci 0 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0xb6 2009-09-10 13:34:25.032341 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 1=
2
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0 L2CAP(s): Disconn req: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0041 2009-09-10 13:34:25.032646 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 1=
2
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0 L2CAP(s): Disconn rsp: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0041 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Analysis Result =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D For some kinds of Bluetooth headset such as Motorola H560/H620 wh=
ich
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
are based on BCM2044S, they will send L2CAP Disconn_Req command r=
ight
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
after sending rfcomm UA frame. This L2CAP Disconn_Req will cause =
the
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
rfcomm socket state become BT_CLOSED before completely handling U=
A
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
frame, thus it will cause kernel panic. I think we can ignore the received rfcomm frames if socket state is BT_CLOSED, because it doesn't make sense in the BT_CLOSED state. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Changed Code =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D We changed the code in the function rfcomm_process_rx() in net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c, check the socket state first before handling the received framew. If the socket state is BT_CLOSED, w=
e
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
don't handle any rfcomm frames but just close the session. The change is like below + =A0 =A0 =A0 if (sk->sk_state !=3D BT_CLOSED) { =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 /* Get data directly from socket receive queue wi=
thout copying it. */
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 while ((skb =3D skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue=
))) {quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 skb_orphan(skb); =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 rfcomm_recv_frame(s, skb); =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 } - - =A0 =A0 =A0 if (sk->sk_state =3D=3D BT_CLOSED) { + =A0 =A0 =A0 } else { =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if (!s->initiator) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 rfcomm_session_pu=
t(s);
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 rfcomm_session_close(s, sk->sk_er=
r);
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0}so I do see the issue here, but I don't agree with the fix since i=
t
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
changes behavior that might cause other issues. So in case the fra=
me
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
processing leads to sk->sk_state =3D=3D BT_CLOSED we are not closi=
ng the
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
connection anymore if we make it depend on a state before the fram=
e
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
processing. And nothing guarantees that rfcomm_process_rx gets sch=
eduled
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
again.diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/co=
re.c
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
index 94b3388..606143b 100644--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c@@ -1798,12 +1798,16 @@ static inline void rfcomm_process_rx(struc=
t rfcomm_session *s)
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0BT_DBG("session %p state %ld qlen %d", s, s->state,=
skb_queue_len(&sk->sk_receive_queue));
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ =A0 =A0 =A0 rfcomm_session_hold(s); + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0/* Get data directly from socket receive queue with=
out copying it. */
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0while ((skb =3D skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue))=
) {quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0skb_orphan(skb); =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0rfcomm_recv_frame(s, skb); =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0} + =A0 =A0 =A0 rfcomm_session_put(s); + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0if (sk->sk_state =3D=3D BT_CLOSED) { =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0if (!s->initiator) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0rfcomm_session_put(=
s);
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
What does the above patch do for you? Since if I read it correctly=
, then
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoting not expanded further in this message
the rfcomm_recv_ua causes the rfcomm_session_put to trigger the cl=
osing
quoting not expanded further in this message
of the session. And then in this case it is delayed until after al=
l
quoting not expanded further in this message
frames are processed. I've tried your patch but unfortunately kernel panic still happened. From the log I noticed that if rfcomm_l2state_change is called befor=
e
quoting not expanded further in this message
rfcomm_process_rx, kernel panic will happen definitely. Below lines are in the correct log, [ =A0139.323852] rfcomm_l2data_ready: ccf70000 bytes 4 [ =A0139.346252] rfcomm_process_rx: session ccb94ce0 state 8 qlen 1 ... [ =A0139.457519] rfcomm_l2state_change: ccf70000 state 9 (disconnect ok) In the above case, when process_rx, the code in the condition "if (sk->sk_state =3D=3D BT_CLOSED)" will never run. Below lines are in the panic log, [ =A0174.898284] rfcomm_l2data_ready: ccf70400 bytes 4 [ =A0174.903442] rfcomm_l2state_change: ccf70400 state 9 [ =A0174.908874] rfcomm_process_rx: session cc751be0 state 8 qlen 1 ... ( then panic) In the above case, sk_state is changed to 9 (BT_CLOSED) firstly, =A0=
then
quoting not expanded further in this message
process_rx, so the code in the condition "if (sk->sk_state =3D=3D BT_CLOSED) " will be run, it will call session_put twice. I think th=
is
quoting not expanded further in this message
is the root cause of panic. I know why it happens, that is not the problem. My point is not to br=
eak
quoting not expanded further in this message
current scheduling assumptions. So if you move the rfcomm_session_put() now at the end of the functio=
n,
quoting not expanded further in this message
then it should be fine, right? Regards Marcel You are right. I moved the rfcomm_session_put() at the end of rfcomm_process_tx() then kernel panic doesn't happen any longer. The changed code is like below, @@ -1796,6 +1796,8 @@ static inline void rfcomm_process_rx(struct rfco=
mm_session
quoting not expanded further in this message
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0BT_DBG("session %p state %ld qlen %d", s, s->state, skb=_queue_len(&sk->s
quoting not expanded further in this message
+ =A0 =A0 =A0 rfcomm_session_hold(s); + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0/* Get data directly from socket receive queue without =
copying it. */
quoting not expanded further in this message
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0while ((skb =3D skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue))) {
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0skb_orphan(skb);
@@ -1808,6 +1810,8 @@ static inline void rfcomm_process_rx(struct rfco=mm_session
quoting not expanded further in this message
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0rfcomm_session_close(s, sk->sk_err); =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0} + + =A0 =A0 =A0 rfcomm_session_put(s); =A0} =A0static inline void rfcomm_accept_connection(struct rfcomm_session *=
s)
quoting not expanded further in this message
Please submit this change to bluez release. Thank you, Zhu Lan http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=3Dkernel/common.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3D6f50=
5dbe5337e49302574f8d2e65fd83e30f9117
quoting not expanded further in this message
If Bluez wants to cherry-pick it. if it would have a proper commit message and author details, I would, but that is not the case. The whole patch + commit message is missing the background on why we have to do it.
Guys how are we going to proceed with it? I think this patch is important as we also see couple of crashes recently. Is commit to android missing some information? Regards, Andrei