Re: [PATCH] block: switch to atomic_t for request references
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-12-07 15:51:56
Also in:
lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-12-07 15:51:56
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 02:28:22PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
+static inline void refcount_inc(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ int one = 1;
+
+ asm_volatile_goto (LOCK_PREFIX "xaddl %%eax, %[var]\n\t"
+ "addl $1, %%eax\n\t"
+ "je %l[cc_zero]\n\t"
+ "js %l[cc_error]"
+ : : [var] "m" (r->refs.counter), "a" (one)
+ : "memory"
+ : cc_zero, cc_error);+ asm_volatile_goto (LOCK_PREFIX "xaddl %[reg], %[var]\n\t" + "addl $1, %[reg]\n\t" + "jz %l[cc_zero]\n\t" + "js %l[cc_error]" + : : [var] "m" (r->refs.counter), [reg] "r" (1) + : "memory" + : cc_zero, cc_error); Is of course a better implementation, but I'm not sure I actually understand this code. Afaict: add $1,%[reg], will only set ZF when %[reg] was -1 such that the result is now 0. But that's not what the code said; is this GCC going funny in the head or should I just stop staring at this...