Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 6 authors, 2021-12-10

Re: [PATCH] block: switch to atomic_t for request references

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-07 04:56:16
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 04:13:00PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:28 PM Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I'm not arguing for refcount_t -- I'm arguing for an API that isn't a
regression of features that have been protecting the kernel from bugs.
Maybe somebody could actually just fix refcount_t instead. Somebody
who cares about that currently horrendously bad interface.

Fix it to not do the fundamentally broken saturation that actively
destroys state: fix it to have a safe "try to increment", instead of
an unsafe "increment and do bad things".
There would need to be a pretty hefty transition -- there are a lot of
refcount_inc() uses that would need checking and error handling (which
might not be sane to add to ancient drivers):

      2 block
      2 crypto
      2 ipc
      2 virt
      3 mm
      4 sound
      5 rust
     10 arch
     13 security
     31 kernel
     88 include
    192 fs
    192 net
    358 drivers

refcount_inc_not_zero() already uses __must_check, etc.

I'm not afraid of giant transitions, but this could be pretty tricky.
I'm open to ideas. Maybe a treewide change of refcount_inc() ->
refcount_inc_saturating() and then start fixing all the _unsafe() cases
where a sensible error path could be created and tested?

-- 
Kees Cook
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help