Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] block: fix ioprio interface
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date: 2021-08-06 08:38:07
Also in:
linux-f2fs-devel
On 8/6/21 8:57 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On 2021/08/06 15:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:quoted
On 8/6/21 7:11 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:quoted
An iocb aio_reqprio field is 16-bits (u16) but often handled as an int in the block layer. E.g. ioprio_check_cap() takes an int as argument. With such implicit int casting function calls, the upper 16-bits of the int argument may be left uninitialized by the compiler, resulting in invalid values for the IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS() macro (garbage upper bits) and in an error return for functions such as ioprio_check_cap(). Fix this by masking the result of the shift by IOPRIO_CLASS_SHIFT bits in the IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS() macro. The new macro IOPRIO_CLASS_MASK defines the 3-bits mask for the priority class. While at it, cleanup the following: * Apply the mask IOPRIO_PRIO_MASK to the data argument of the IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE() macro to ignore upper bits of the data value. * Remove unnecessary parenthesis around fixed values in the macro definitions in include/uapi/linux/ioprio.h. * Update the outdated mention of CFQ in the comment describing priority classes and instead mention BFQ and mq-deadline. * Change the argument name of the IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS() and IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA() macros from "mask" to "ioprio" to reflect the fact that an IO priority value should be passed rather than a mask. * Change the ioprio_valid() macro into an inline function, adding a check on the maximum value of the class of a priority value as defined by the IOPRIO_CLASS_MAX enum value. Move this function to the kernel side in include/linux/ioprio.h. * Remove the unnecessary "else" after the return statements in task_nice_ioclass(). Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <redacted> --- include/linux/ioprio.h | 15 ++++++++++++--- include/uapi/linux/ioprio.h | 19 +++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/ioprio.h b/include/linux/ioprio.h index ef9ad4fb245f..9b3a6d8172b4 100644 --- a/include/linux/ioprio.h +++ b/include/linux/ioprio.h@@ -8,6 +8,16 @@ #include <uapi/linux/ioprio.h> +/* + * Check that a priority value has a valid class. + */ +static inline bool ioprio_valid(unsigned short ioprio)Wouldn't it be better to use 'u16' here as type, as we're relying on the number of bits?Other functions in block/ioprio.c and in include/linux/ioprio.h use "unsigned short", so I followed. But many functions, if not most, use "int". This is all a bit of a mess. I think we need a "typedef ioprio_t u16;" to clean things up. But there are a lot of places to fix. I can add such patch... Worth it ?
Possibly not. Consider my comment retracted :-) Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer