Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 4 authors, 2020-06-23

Re: kprobe: __blkdev_put probe is missed

From: Ming Lei <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-18 23:19:41
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:56:02PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Hi Ming,

On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:54:38 +0800
Ming Lei [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 06:30:39PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted
Hello Guys,

I found probe on __blkdev_put is missed, which can be observed
via bcc/perf reliably:

1) start trace
- perf probe __blkdev_put
- perf trace -a  -e probe:__blkdev_put
Could you dump the kprobe_event as below?

# cat /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events

quoted
quoted
or

/usr/share/bcc/tools/stackcount __blkdev_put

2) run the following command:
blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda1
And dump the kprobe profile?

# cat /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_profile
quoted
quoted
3) 'perf trace'  or stackcount just  dumps one trace event, and it
should have been two
__blkdev_put() traces, since one __blkdev_put() is called for
partition(/dev/sda1),
and another is for disk(/dev/sda). If trace_printk() is added in __blkdev_put(),
two events will be captured from ftrace.
The issue can be shown by loading a kprobe module which registers on
__blkdev_put(), just by replacing _do_fork with __blkdev_put on
samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c.
Could you tell me what kernel are you using?

I'm using 5.4 on ubuntu and can not reproduce it with kprobe_event.

root@devnote2:/sys/kernel/tracing# uname -a
Linux devnote2 5.4.0-37-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 3 18:57:02 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@devnote2:/sys/kernel/tracing# echo p __blkdev_put > kprobe_events 
root@devnote2:/sys/kernel/tracing# echo 1 > events/kprobes/p___blkdev_put_0/enable 
root@devnote2:/sys/kernel/tracing# cat trace
# tracer: nop
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 0/0   #P:8
#
#                              _-----=> irqs-off
#                             / _----=> need-resched
#                            | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
#                            || / _--=> preempt-depth
#                            ||| /     delay
#           TASK-PID   CPU#  ||||    TIMESTAMP  FUNCTION
#              | |       |   ||||       |         |
root@devnote2:/sys/kernel/tracing# blockdev --getbsz /dev/nvme0n1
4096
root@devnote2:/sys/kernel/tracing# cat trace
# tracer: nop
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 1/1   #P:8
#
#                              _-----=> irqs-off
#                             / _----=> need-resched
#                            | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
#                            || / _--=> preempt-depth
#                            ||| /     delay
#           TASK-PID   CPU#  ||||    TIMESTAMP  FUNCTION
#              | |       |   ||||       |         |
           <...>-111740 [002] .... 301734.476991: p___blkdev_put_0: (__blkdev_put+0x0/0x1e0)

Hmm, maybe some issue in the latest kernel...?
Hello Masami,

I am testing the latest upstream kernel, your trace actually reproduces
this issue.

After 'blockdev --getbsz /dev/nvme0n1' returns, __blkdev_put() should
have been called two times(one for partition, and the other for disk),
however kprobe trace just shows one time of calling this function.

If trace_printk() is added at the entry of __blkdev_put() manually,
you will see that __blkdev_put() is called two times in 'blockdev
--getbsz /dev/nvme0n1'.


Thanks,
Ming
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help