Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8188-geralt: Add MT6319 PMIC
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Date: 2026-07-08 08:02:23
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
On 7/8/26 06:25, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 7:24 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 7/7/26 13:08, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 7:05 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 7/7/26 12:44, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:quoted
The Geralt design uses a MT6319 PMIC to power the big cores and LPDDR4X DRAM. Add a device node for it and hook up all the supplies. This change requires a firmware fix for the SPMI bus to read back correctly. The required firmware version is 15842.175.0. This is included in ChromeOS releases R150-16700.22.0 (available in Beta channel as of writing or stable channel in mid-July) or R151-16721.0.0 and later. Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>This is a big problem then. I take it as if the firmware fix is not in place, probing the CPU power supplies will fail, with all the consequences.That's right.quoted
This means that with this, we're breaking all Geralt machines with older firmware, which is not acceptable... ...so this needs a different solution, or strong reasons to make me understand that I'm wrong, if I'm wrong.We can drop the CPU supplies (they don't matter since cpufreq is hardware driven) and just add the regulators. How does that sound? If the firmware isn't updated, the PMIC will fail to probe, but since nothing is using it, the system will continue to work (with some annoying error messages).That'd be wrong, but less wrong than not having anything described...Yeah. As I said, it doesn't affect usability.quoted
...I wonder if, at this point, you could set the SPMI node to status = "fail" and have the *new* firmware override that to "ok". That's the only reasonable way to go forward, IMO.I'm afraid it is unlikely to get a firmware release to fix a non-critical issue. We were fortunate that there was an actual critical issue being fixed that allowed me to merge the small fix for the SPMI controller.
Yeah, I know how it is regarding firmware updates... but you know, I *must* try to get OEMs/ODMs to do the right thing when hacky things get in front of me, and I am fully aware that many of them largely underestimate such issues, and even close the possibility to fix those, which is even worst. On the other hand, I know you, and I know that you always try to do the same whenever you can, so please, be aware that I'm not complaining about you.
I think it would be great if everyone could update their OS and firmware, but I understand that some devices never get updates, such as those in board farms that never boot into ChromeOS.
Unfortunately, this is not just a ChromeOS problem but way larger... Anyway, I'll stop here to prevent myself from going OT too much and being grumpier than I already am :-P I guess then just add the SPMI PMIC and add a big comment that clearly states something like /* * The mt6319_buck1 is the cpu-supply for CPU6 and CPU7. * * However, this device ships with a broken firmware which needs to be updated to * at version XXXXXXX or newer in order to workaround a bug that (describe bug). * * [blahblah text so that's why the cpu supply was not assigned to cpu6/7]. */ ...so that everyone reading the DT is fully aware of what's going on and can act accordingly if they wish. How does that sound? Cheers, Angelo
ChenYuquoted
Of course, avoid having the firmware adding the CPU supplies, because that would be rather sketchy then. Just "if spmi status fail found, change to ok". Cheers, Angeloquoted
ChenYuquoted
Cheers, Angeloquoted
--- .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8188-geralt.dtsi | 66 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8188-geralt.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8188-geralt.dtsi index f382f90c48f5..fea52c377d88 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8188-geralt.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8188-geralt.dtsi@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ */ /dts-v1/; #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> + #include "mt8188.dtsi" #include "mt6359.dtsi"@@ -241,6 +243,14 @@ &cpu5 { cpu-supply = <&mt6359_vcore_buck_reg>; }; +&cpu6 { + cpu-supply = <&mt6319_buck1>; +}; + +&cpu7 { + cpu-supply = <&mt6319_buck1>; +}; + /* * Geralt is the reference design and doesn't have target TDP. * Ciri is (currently) the only device following Geralt, and its@@ -1156,6 +1166,14 @@ pins-bus { }; }; + spmi_pins: spmi-pins { + pins-bus { + pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO175__FUNC_B0_SPMI_M_SCL>, + <PINMUX_GPIO176__FUNC_B0_SPMI_M_SDA>; + bias-disable; + }; + }; + uart0_pins: uart0-pins { pins-bus { pinmux = <PINMUX_GPIO31__FUNC_O_UTXD0>,@@ -1267,6 +1285,54 @@ &spi2 { status = "okay"; }; +&spmi { + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&spmi_pins>; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <0>; + status = "okay"; + + pmic@6 { + compatible = "mediatek,mt6319-regulator", "mediatek,mt6315-regulator"; + reg = <0x6 SPMI_USID>; + pvdd1-supply = <&pp4200_s5>; + pvdd2-supply = <&pp4200_s5>; + pvdd3-supply = <&pp4200_s5>; + pvdd4-supply = <&pp4200_s5>; + + regulators { + mt6319_buck1: vbuck1 { + regulator-name = "ppvar_dvdd_proc_bc"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <520000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1155000>; + regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <256>; + regulator-allowed-modes = <0 1 2>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + /* vbuck2 is ganged with vbuck1 */ + + mt6319_buck3: vbuck3 { + regulator-name = "pp1125_emi_vdd2"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1060000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1170000>; + regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <256>; + regulator-allowed-modes = <0 1 2>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + mt6319_buck4: vbuck4 { + regulator-name = "pp0600_emi_vddq"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <570000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <650000>; + regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <256>; + regulator-allowed-modes = <0 1 2>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + }; + }; +}; + &uart0 { pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pins>;