On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 03:52:39PM +0800, Yu-Chun Lin wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Tzuyi Chang <redacted>
Rename 'realtek,duty-cycle' to 'realtek,pulse-width-adjust'.
The previous name was misleading because this hardware block is not a PWM
generator. It does not generate a signal with a specific frequency and
duty ratio.
Instead, it provides a fixed nanosecond-level adjustment to the rising/
falling edges of an existing signal.
Signed-off-by: Tzuyi Chang <redacted>
Co-developed-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
---
.../bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml | 9 ++++++---
.../bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1319d-pinctrl.yaml | 9 ++++++---
.../bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1619b-pinctrl.yaml | 9 ++++++---
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml
index 90bd49d87d2e..7b3888b2cea8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -133,10 +133,13 @@ patternProperties:
minimum: 0
maximum: 7
- realtek,duty-cycle:
+ realtek,pulse-width-adjust:
No, that's ABI break without explanation. "misleading" is not the
sufficient argument for breaking ABI.
You are stuck with the ABI you added back in 2023.
Best regards,
Krzysztof