On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 03:52:37PM +0800, Yu-Chun Lin wrote:
From: Tzuyi Chang <redacted>
Add a generic pin configuration property "input-voltage-microvolt" to
specify the input voltage level of a pin in microvolts.
Why?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Tzuyi Chang <redacted>
Co-developed-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml
index a916d0fc79a9..da182c8a1d00 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml
@@ -162,6 +162,10 @@ properties:
this affects the expected delay in ps before latching a value to
an output pin.
+ input-voltage-microvolt:
+ description: Specifies the input voltage level of the pin in microvolts.
+ This defines the reference for VIH/VIL.
What is VIH/VIL? Why generic binding would define the voltage of pins
for pin control?
This patch misses actual background why you are doing it and what sort
of common/typical pinctrl setup you describe.
Best regards,
Krzysztof