Hi Krzysztof,

-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Sent: 18 September 2025 08:13 AM
To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <redacted>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
selvarasu.g@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

On 04/09/2025 19:21, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:

quoted

Hi Krzysztof,

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Sent: 04 September 2025 03:12 PM
To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <redacted>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org;
kauschluss@disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com;
igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
linux-samsung- soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
add
ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

On 04/09/2025 09:51, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:

quoted

Hi Krzysztof,

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM
To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <redacted>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org;
kauschluss@disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com;
igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
linux-samsung- soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
add
ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:

quoted

Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
The
USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC,
so no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add
a dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.

Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <redacted>

You just dropped all tags without explaining why.

Regretted inconvenience.

There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and
schemas (patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5.  And
review for these changes is needed.  Hence, removed RB tag in this patch-

set.

quoted

quoted

quoted

There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux-

phy/000401dc18cd$ec02a1b0$c407e510$@samsung.com/#:~:text=Let%20me%

quoted

quoted

20know%2C%20because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20

quoted

quoted

removing%20your%20%0A%27reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch%

quoted

quoted

201%20and%203.

quoted

Where in the changelog you explained why you dropped the tags?

Along with supplies' names, there were similar commit messages for
patch no 1, 3 as patch no 5 (v7). (though, they were explaining schema
more than h/w). Changed commit messages of the patch no 1, 3, 5 (v7)
as per reference commits and would like to get them reviewed again, so
did not add RB for patch 1 and 3, which you had given RB (in v7).

I do not have time to review the same second time and I find such request quite
a waste of my time. It's v8 so I am surprised to see it getting changed even after
review.	

OK, those were only commit message changes, so I am going to retain your 
RB tags for patch 1 and 3. Sorry about noise.

However, do you want me to send v9 by retaining RB tags in respective patches?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Thank you,

Regards,
Pritam