Re: [PATCH 29/33] arm_mpam: Probe for long/lwd mbwu counters
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Date: 2025-09-10 19:30:45
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Ben, On 28/08/2025 17:14, Ben Horgan wrote:
On 8/22/25 16:30, James Morse wrote:quoted
From: Rohit Mathew <redacted> mpam v0.1 and versions above v1.0 support optional long counter for memory bandwidth monitoring. The MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR register have fields indicating support for long counters. As of now, a 44 bit counter represented by HAS_LONG field (bit 30) and a 63 bit counter represented by LWD (bit 29) can be optionally integrated. Probe for these counters and set corresponding feature bits if any of these counters are present.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c index 11be34b54643..2ab7f127baaa 100644 --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c@@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris) pr_err_once("Counters are not usable because not-ready timeout was not provided by firmware."); } if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MSMON_IDR_MSMON_MBWU, msmon_features)) { - bool hw_managed; + bool has_long, hw_managed; u32 mbwumonidr = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBWUMON_IDR);
nit: the variable name would be more readable with an underscore, mwumon_idr.
Sure,
quoted
props->num_mbwu_mon = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_NUM_MON, mbwumonidr);
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h index 9a50a5432f4a..9f627b5f72a1 100644 --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h@@ -178,7 +178,15 @@ enum mpam_device_features { mpam_feat_msmon_csu, mpam_feat_msmon_csu_capture, mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy, + + /* + * Having mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu set doesn't mean the regular 31 bit MBWU + * counter would be used. The exact counter used is decided based on the + * status of mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_l/mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_lwd as well.
mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter/mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter
That's my fault - I hate the names for these things!
quoted
+ */ mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu, + mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter, + mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter, mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_capture, mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw, mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy,Other than the two nits, the change looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Thanks! James