RE: [RESEND v3 1/5] PCI: dwc: Don't poll L2 if QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM is existing in suspend
From: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Date: 2025-08-19 05:51:46
Also in:
imx, linux-pci, lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> Sent: 2025年8月18日 23:49 To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> Cc: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; jingoohan1@gmail.com; l.stach@pengutronix.de; lpieralisi@kernel.org; kwilczynski@kernel.org; mani@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; bhelgaas@google.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; kernel@pengutronix.de; festevam@gmail.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; imx@lists.linux.dev; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND v3 1/5] PCI: dwc: Don't poll L2 if QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM is existing in suspend On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:quoted
Refer to PCIe r6.0, sec 5.2, fig 5-1 Link Power Management State Flow Diagram. Both L0 and L2/L3 Ready can be transferred to LDn directly. It's harmless to let dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() proceed suspend after the PME_Turn_Off is sent out, whatever the LTSSM state is in L2 or L3 after a recommended 10ms max wait refer to PCIe r6.0, sec 5.3.3.2.1 PME Synchronization. The LTSSM states are inaccessible on i.MX6QP and i.MX7D after the PME_Turn_Off is sent out. To support this case, don't poll L2 state and apply a simple delay of PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US(10ms) if the QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM flagisquoted
set in suspend. Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> --- .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 31 +++++++++++++------ drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 4 +++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.cb/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c index 952f8594b5012..20a7f827babbf 100644--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ int dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct dw_pcie *pci){ u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); u32 val; - int ret; + int ret = 0; /* * If L1SS is supported, then do not put the link into L2 as some* devices such as NVMe expect low resume latency. */ if (dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL) & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPM_L1) return 0; You didn't change it in this patch (the L1SS test was added by 4774faf854f5 ("PCI: dwc: Implement generic suspend/resume functionality")), but this L1SS check is an encapsulation problem. The ASPM configuration shouldn't leak out here in such an ad hoc way.
Hi Bjorn: Thanks for your comments. Should I created another commit to get ride of the L1SS check codes?
*All* drivers, not just NVMe, would prefer low resume latency. How do we deal with this in other host controller drivers? If any other driver puts links in L2, I suppose they would have the same issue? Maybe DWC is the only one that puts the link in L2? What happens when we add a new driver that puts links in L2? I guess we'll be debugging some NVMe issue again?
Up to now, this is the first one routine to do the L1SS check in L2 entry. Best Regards Richard Zhu
Bjorn