Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 2 authors, 2025-08-21

Re: [RESEND v3 1/5] PCI: dwc: Don't poll L2 if QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM is existing in suspend

From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-08-18 15:48:35
Also in: imx, linux-pci, lkml

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Refer to PCIe r6.0, sec 5.2, fig 5-1 Link Power Management State Flow
Diagram. Both L0 and L2/L3 Ready can be transferred to LDn directly.

It's harmless to let dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() proceed suspend after the
PME_Turn_Off is sent out, whatever the LTSSM state is in L2 or L3 after
a recommended 10ms max wait refer to PCIe r6.0, sec 5.3.3.2.1 PME
Synchronization.

The LTSSM states are inaccessible on i.MX6QP and i.MX7D after the
PME_Turn_Off is sent out.

To support this case, don't poll L2 state and apply a simple delay of
PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US(10ms) if the QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM flag is set
in suspend.

Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
 .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 31 +++++++++++++------
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h  |  4 +++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
index 952f8594b5012..20a7f827babbf 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ int dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct dw_pcie *pci)
 {
 	u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
 	u32 val;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
      /*
       * If L1SS is supported, then do not put the link into L2 as some
         * devices such as NVMe expect low resume latency.
         */
         if (dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL) & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPM_L1)
                return 0;

You didn't change it in this patch (the L1SS test was added by
4774faf854f5 ("PCI: dwc: Implement generic suspend/resume
functionality")), but this L1SS check is an encapsulation problem.
The ASPM configuration shouldn't leak out here in such an ad hoc way.

*All* drivers, not just NVMe, would prefer low resume latency.

How do we deal with this in other host controller drivers?  If any
other driver puts links in L2, I suppose they would have the same
issue?  Maybe DWC is the only one that puts the link in L2?

What happens when we add a new driver that puts links in L2?  I guess
we'll be debugging some NVMe issue again?

Bjorn
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help