On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:04:19PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025, Oliver Upton wrote:
quoted
Can you just send it out as a standalone patch? It's only tangientally
related to the truckload of x86 stuff
The issue is that "KVM: Don't WARN if updating IRQ bypass route fails" directly
depends on both this patch
Eh? At worst we break bisection for the warn, which I'm sure we manage
to commit similar high crimes on the regular.
If I post it as a standalone patch, could you/Marc put it into a stable topic
branch based on kvm/master? (kvm/master now has patch 1, yay!) Then I can create
a topic branch for this mountain of stuff based on the arm64 topic branch.
Ok, how about making the arm64 piece patch 1 in your series and you take
the whole pile. If we need it, I'll bug you for a ref that only has the
first change.
That ok?
Thanks,
Oliver